We offer comprehensive legal support to private equity and venture capital firms, as well as emerging businesses seeking funding. From fund formation and investment structuring to exit strategies, and from trust law and fund regulations to tax optimization, our team is well-versed in the nuances of this dynamic sector, enabling our clients to capitalize on investment opportunities and foster growth.
Fund Formation and Structuring
Assisting in setting up private equity, venture capital, AIFs and other funds, drafting and negotiation structures from Limited Partnership Agreements (LPAs) to Private Placement Memorandums (PPMs).
Deal Negotiations and Due Diligence
Negotiating and structuring investment deals, conducting thorough due diligence on potential targets to identify risks and opportunities for a well-informed investment decision-making, which aligns with the client's investment theses.
Equity and Debt Investments
Strategic counselling on equity and debt investments and hybrid investment structures, for target companies ranging from growth-stage businesses to distressed assets.
Corporate Governance
Advising investors regarding legal issues related to good corporate governance practices, for compliant running of portfolio companies.
Investor Relations
Assisting in drafting fund reporting documents and handling investor communications, with focus on legal and regulatory changes and their impact on business.
Investment Dispute Resolution
Mitigating investment disputes through ADR mechanisms, and representing investors in litigation proceedings upon escalation.
M&A and Exit Management
Advising on acquisition and divestiture of portfolio companies, handling complex M&A transactions, advising on exit strategies, including IPOs, secondary offerings, and trade sales, to help maximize returns.
More Insights
2026-04-06
5
min read
Minority Exit under S. 66: The Supreme Court on Fairness, Valuation, and the Limits of Judicial Scrutiny
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Pannalal Bhansali v. Bharti Telecom Ltd. clarifies the contours of fairness under Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. It reinforces a market-based approach to valuation, affirms the permissibility of DLOM, and underscores judicial deference in the absence of oppression, marking a significant shift in minority exit jurisprudence.
2025-11-12
14
min read
A Bird’s Eye View of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Framework for Personal Guarantors under the IBC with Recent Judicial Developments
A concise overview of the personal insolvency and bankruptcy framework for personal guarantors under the IBC, with key NCLAT and NCLT rulings shaping the law. This piece explains initiation, moratoriums, repayment plans, creditor rights, bankruptcy triggers, and the 2025 Amendment Bill, offering a clear snapshot of the evolving jurisprudence and its practical implications for stakeholders.
2025-05-19
4
min read
Supreme Court Reiterates Strict Limitation Framework Under IBC: No Condonation Beyond 45 Days for Appeals Before NCLAT
The Supreme Court, in Tata Steel Ltd. v. Raj Kumar Banerjee, reinforced the rigid limitation regime under the IBC by holding that appeals to the NCLAT must be filed within the prescribed 30-day window, with only a 15-day grace period allowed. The judgment underscores that even non-parties are bound by the statutory timeline, and tribunals cannot condone delays beyond this 45-day limit, ensuring procedural certainty and speed in insolvency proceedings.