Metalegal is the best law firm for M&A, specializing in handling complex mergers and acquisitions (M&A) and joint ventures for both domestic and international clients. We provide end-to-end legal assistance, from conducting due diligence and structuring transactions to negotiating agreements and obtaining regulatory approvals. Our team's proficiency ensures seamless execution and successful outcomes for our clients' business expansion and collaboration endeavors.
Due Diligence
Conducting legal due diligence to identify potential risks and liabilities, evaluation of representations and warranties, through a collective experience of advocates, chartered accountants, valuation, and subject matter experts.
Negotiation and Structuring
Designing and structuring deals to optimize terms while ensuring alignment with legal mandates.
Documentation
Drafting and reviewing complex contracts and agreements such as term-sheets, MOUs, SHAs, SPAs, Share Swap Agreements, Non-compete and Non-solicitation Agreements, Asset and Stock Purchase Agreements, Business Transfer Agreements, besides others.
Competition Law
Securing necessary approvals and ensuring adherence to competition laws (Competition Act, 2002), industry regulations, and cross-border considerations.
Shareholder & Stakeholder Management
Strategic counseling on engaging various shareholders and stakeholders and creating legal relationships between them to ensure productive post-M&A integration.
People Transition
Advising clients through complex labour and employment considerations during M&A and restructuring exercises.
Tax Laws
Advisory and representation for tax cost minimization, in both direct (income-tax, black money), and indirect (GST, customs) taxes and other economic laws
More Insights
22-06-2026
8
min read
Claim Admission is not Debt Acknowledgement: Supreme Court on RP’s Role & Limitation under the IBC
Can admission of a claim by a Resolution Professional extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act? In Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, holding that claim admission during CIRP is merely a statutory claim-verification process and not an acknowledgement of debt. The ruling clarifies the RP’s non-adjudicatory role and reinforces important principles governing limitation under the IBC.
2026-04-06
5
min read
Minority Exit under S. 66: The Supreme Court on Fairness, Valuation, and the Limits of Judicial Scrutiny
The Supreme Court’s ruling in Pannalal Bhansali v. Bharti Telecom Ltd. clarifies the contours of fairness under Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013. It reinforces a market-based approach to valuation, affirms the permissibility of DLOM, and underscores judicial deference in the absence of oppression, marking a significant shift in minority exit jurisprudence.
2025-11-12
14
min read
A Bird’s Eye View of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Framework for Personal Guarantors under the IBC with Recent Judicial Developments
A concise overview of the personal insolvency and bankruptcy framework for personal guarantors under the IBC, with key NCLAT and NCLT rulings shaping the law. This piece explains initiation, moratoriums, repayment plans, creditor rights, bankruptcy triggers, and the 2025 Amendment Bill, offering a clear snapshot of the evolving jurisprudence and its practical implications for stakeholders.