Tax Law

Business and commercial advisory at its best.

Tax Law

Business and commercial advisory at its best.

Tax Law

Business and commercial advisory at its best.

Our firm’s expertise in transfer pricing helps businesses establish arm’s-length pricing and navigate transfer pricing regulations to avoid disputes and penalties, select the most appropriate method, and identify comparables. We offer comprehensive support in compliance, documentation, and representation in transfer pricing law. Our advocates and chartered accountants possess in-depth expertise in the latest developments in the law, OECD forums, and international transfer-pricing jurisprudence. 

No headings found on page
No headings found on page
Transfer Pricing Studies

Advising on and reviewing transfer pricing studies, justifications and the accuracy of comparables, and the most appropriate method; reviewing functions, assets, and risk (FAR) analyses of businesses to ensure accurate compliance with the arm’s-length principle. 

Comparable Analysis and Defence

Advising and representing clients in challenges to the selection of comparables for determining the arm’s-length price, reviewing functional analyses, contractual terms, economic realities, and business strategies for transfer-pricing matters. 

Intangibles and Intellectual Property

Navigating through the complexities of intangible assets (technology intangibles, trade intangibles, marketing intangibles etc.) and intellectual property (IP) in the realm of transfer pricing and justification of the arm’s length price of these properties. 

Cost Sharing and Inter-company Services

Offering guidance on cost-sharing arrangements, ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements while optimizing the allocation of costs among group entities and pricing inter-company (intra-group) services.

Integrating Transfer Pricing and International Tax

Offering comprehensive advice to multinational businesses, by integrating international tax law with transfer pricing strategies, ensuring a holistic approach to cross-border tax optimisation.

Litigation

Representing client interests before the assessing and investigating authorities, Transfer Pricing Officers (TPO), Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP), Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), various High Courts and the Supreme Court of India. 

More Insights

Cover image for the article: A Game of Treasure Hunt: Service of GST Notices and Orders under S. 169 of the CGST Act and the Emerging Split Among High Courts

25 Aug 2026

12

min read

A Game of Treasure Hunt: Service of GST Notices and Orders under S. 169 of the CGST Act and the Emerging Split among High Courts

Luxmi Traders addresses a fundamental question in GST adjudication: can a notice or order be treated as duly served merely because it is uploaded on the Common Portal? The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that portal-only service, absent the requisite statutory and notified basis, cannot by itself defeat a taxpayer’s remedies. With Madras and Allahabad adopting different approaches and Delhi subsequently applying Luxmi Traders, the issue reflects a significant divergence in judicial approach awaiting authoritative resolution.

Cover image for the article: Faceless Reassessment after S. 147A: What the Supreme Court Did – and Did Not – Decide

10 Jul 2026

7

min read

Faceless Reassessment after S. 147A: What the Supreme Court Did – and Did Not – Decide

The Supreme Court's decision in Tej Pratap Singh does not settle the JAO–FAO controversy. Following Parliament's retrospective insertion of s. 147A, it remands the issue to the High Courts for fresh consideration. Faceless reassessment was never merely about moving tax files from paper to portal; it fundamentally changed the statutory authority responsible for communicating with the taxpayer, examining the record, drafting the order and completing the assessment. The real question now is how far a retrospective legislative clarification can go.

Article cover for Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Indirect Tax Laws: A Barrier to Justice?

23 Apr 2026

18

min read

Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Indirect Tax Laws: A Barrier to Justice?

Mandatory pre-deposit has become a defining feature of indirect tax litigation, balancing revenue protection with access to appellate remedies. While the shift to a fixed statutory framework has improved procedural efficiency, it also raises concerns regarding financial barriers and effective access to justice. This insight examines the legal evolution, judicial interpretation, and practical implications of the regime.