Cover image for the article: SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

18 Dec 2024

SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

3

Min Read

Cover image for the article: SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

18 Dec 2024

SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

3

Min Read

Cover image for the article: SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

18 Dec 2024

SEBI LODR Third Amendment 2024: What Listed Entities Must Know

3

Min Read

Introduction

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (‘SEBI’) introduced significant amendments to the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (LODR) Regulations, 2015 (‘LODR Regulations’)[i]. The recent amendments will be known as SEBI (Listing Obligations And Disclosure Requirements) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2024 (‘Amendment Regulations’). These Amendment Regulations will take effect on 31.12.2024, while certain provisions, such as those concerning secretarial audit, will come into force starting 01.04.2025. These changes are set to affect listed companies and aim to enhance corporate governance, increase transparency and ensure timely reporting of material events. Some changes come with stringent timelines, while others mandate adopting new compliance measures.

The LODR Regulations were introduced in 2015 to govern the obligations and disclosure requirements of listed companies in India. These Regulations prescribe detailed compliance requirements for listed companies, including disclosure of financial results, material events, corporate governance norms, and the responsibilities of the board of directors (‘BoD’) and management. They are periodically amended to align with evolving corporate governance standards and investor needs.

Here’s what the companies need to know:

1. Reg. 6 - Compliance Officer

  • The compliance officer shall be an officer who is in whole-time employment of the listed entity, not more than one level below the BoD and shall be designated as key managerial personnel (‘KMP’).

  • The new provision also mandates that listed entities undergoing the corporate insolvency resolution process (‘CIRP’) must appoint KMP within 3 months of the approval of the resolution plan. During the interim period, at least one full-time KMP must be responsible for managing day-to-day operations.

This change ensures operational continuity and stronger management oversight, especially in companies undergoing insolvency proceedings.

2. Reg. 13 - Investor Grievance Redressal

  • This amendment introduces the requirement for listed entities to submit a detailed statement on a quarterly basis that outlines how investor grievances have been addressed in the format and timeline as may be prescribed by the BoD.

This will standardize how grievances are tracked and reported, making comparing and analysing grievance handling across companies easier.

3. Reg. 17 - BoD

  • Non-executive directors (NEDs) aged over 75 years require shareholder approval for appointment or continuation in office.

  • Any vacancy in the committees of the BoD must be filled within 3 months or by the date of the vacancy’s occurrence, whichever is earlier.

These changes aim to strengthen governance structures and address gaps in leadership.

4. Reg. 23 - Related Party Transactions (‘RPTs’)

  • Corporate actions such as dividends, stock splits, and rights issues that are uniformly applicable to all shareholders are excluded from the definition of RPTs.

  • Omnibus approvals can now be granted for recurring RPTs involving subsidiaries. Ratification provisions have also been introduced, allowing RPTs to be ratified by the Audit Committee within 3 months.

These changes streamline compliance processes while retaining checks for material RPTs.

5.  Reg. 24A - Secretarial Audit

  • Secretarial audits must now be conducted by peer-reviewed company secretaries starting 01.04.2025.

  • Restrictions have been placed on secretarial auditors from rendering services that may impair independence.

This aligns secretarial audits with statutory audit practices, thereby enhancing audit quality and independence.

6. Reg. 30 - Disclosure of Material Events

  • Disclosure timelines for material events, including litigation disclosures, have been relaxed. For example, entities now have 72 hours instead of 24 to disclose non-tax litigation claims.

  • Enhanced thresholds for disclosing acquisitions and penalties imposed by sectoral regulators have been introduced.

These amendments balance the need for prompt disclosures with practical compliance timelines.

7. Reg. 31A - Promoter Reclassification

  • Stricter timelines for promoter reclassification have been introduced:

a. The BoD must analyse requests within two months.

b. Shareholder approvals must be obtained within 60 days of the stock exchange’s no-objection certificate (NOC).

Exemptions have been provided for companies under insolvency or undergoing schemes of arrangement.

8. Reg. 46 - Website Disclosures

  • Mandatory disclosures include Articles of Association (AoA), employee benefit scheme documents, and detailed profiles of BoD.

  • Companies may provide QR codes and web links in newspaper advertisements for better investor access.

This improves transparency and simplifies information dissemination.

Conclusion

The Amendment Regulations significantly overhaul corporate governance and disclosure requirements for listed entities. While fostering enhanced transparency and accountability, they also introduce stricter compliance obligations. By addressing gaps in existing provisions, SEBI has taken a definitive step toward strengthening India’s securities market. The success of these amendments depends on the readiness and timely implementation by listed entities.

 

 

End Note

[i] Notification No. SEBI/LAD-NRO/GN/2024/218 dated 12.12.2024.

Authored by Muskaan Jain, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinions.

More Insights

Cover image for the article: The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

24 Feb 2026

12

Min Read

The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

This essay examines where preventive law has overreached: in compliance frameworks divorced from the actual causes of contraventions, in the systematic reversal of the burden of proof, and most acutely, in the routine deployment of provisional attachment as a pre-adjudicatory punishment. The law designed to address the fear of harm has itself become an object of fear. Preventive law has emerged as the legislature's response to the complexity, scale, and pace of modern business activity and, in jurisdictions like India, as a scaffolding for laws that lack organic social consensus.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable Under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

30 May 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

The Supreme Court, in Shivappa Reddy v. S. Srinivasan, has reaffirmed that partners retiring from a firm must strictly comply with statutory requirements under the Partnership Act to escape liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside a High Court order quashing proceedings and emphasised that non-compliance with Section 72 obligations leaves retired partners exposed to criminal liability for dishonoured cheques.

Cover image for the article: Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

01 May 2025

6

Min Read

Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

The RBI has released the Draft Co-Lending Arrangements Directions, 2025, proposing a unified, market-enabling framework for regulated entities. The draft aims to streamline risk-sharing, pricing, and borrower protections across digital and traditional lending partnerships while replacing fragmented earlier guidelines. This explainer highlights key provisions, compliance expectations, and systemic implications.