Cover image for the article: CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

21 Jul 2023

CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

21 Jul 2023

CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

21 Jul 2023

CBIC CIRCULAR ON APPLICABILITY OF E-INVOICES FOR SUPPLIES TO GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

2

Min Read

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (‘CBIC’) has recently released a circular (Circular No. 198/10/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023) to provide clarity on the applicability of e-invoicing under r. 48(4) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (‘CGST’) Rules, 2017 for transactions involving government departments, establishments, agencies, local authorities, and Public Sector Undertakings (‘PSUs’) registered for tax deduction at source under s. 51 of the CGST Act, 2017.

According to the circular, e-invoicing involves the issuance of electronically authenticated invoices through designated Goods Services and Tax Network (‘GSTN’)notified portals. It is applicable to supplies of goods and services made by registered persons whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold to government departments, establishments, agencies, local authorities, and PSUs registered under s. 51 of the CGST Act. The threshold for requiring e-invoicing has been revised several times since its introduction in 2020. Most recently vide Notification No. 10/2023 dated 10.05.2023, it applies to all registered persons with an aggregate turnover exceeding Rs. 5 crores in any preceding financial year from 2017-18 onwards.

The circular aimed to resolve any ambiguity regarding whether registered persons, whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold for e-invoicing, are required to issue e-invoices for supplies made to government departments, establishments, agencies, local authorities, and PSUs registered solely for tax deduction at source under s. 51 of the CGST Act.

The clarification from CBIC states that government departments, establishments, agencies, local authorities, and PSUs, which are mandated to deduct tax at source under s. 51 of the CGST Act and are also required to register as per s. 24(vi) of the CGST Act, are deemed as registered persons as defined under s. 2(94) of the CGST Act. As a result, any person registered whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold for e-invoicing, is obligated to issue e-invoices for supplies made to such government entities.

The circular issued by the CBIC on 17.07.2023 regarding the issuance of e-invoices for supplies made to government agencies under s. 51 of the CGST Act, provides much indeed clarification. It aims to eliminate the lingering uncertainty about whether registered individuals, whose turnover exceeds the prescribed threshold, must issue e-invoices under r. 48(4) of the CGST Rules for supplies to government bodies, including PSUs, responsible for tax deduction at source under s. 51 of the CGST Act. This circular plays a pivotal role in streamlining the e-invoicing process and promoting transparency in the taxation system. Additionally, it encourages stakeholders to promptly report any difficulties in implementing the circular to the CBIC.

*Authored by Kushagra Gahlot, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion. *

Portrait of Preethi Suresh
Portrait of Preethi Suresh

AUTHORED BY

Project Manager

Project Manager

Project Manager

More Insights

Cover image for the article: The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

24 Feb 2026

12

Min Read

The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

This essay examines where preventive law has overreached: in compliance frameworks divorced from the actual causes of contraventions, in the systematic reversal of the burden of proof, and most acutely, in the routine deployment of provisional attachment as a pre-adjudicatory punishment. The law designed to address the fear of harm has itself become an object of fear. Preventive law has emerged as the legislature's response to the complexity, scale, and pace of modern business activity and, in jurisdictions like India, as a scaffolding for laws that lack organic social consensus.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable Under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

30 May 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

The Supreme Court, in Shivappa Reddy v. S. Srinivasan, has reaffirmed that partners retiring from a firm must strictly comply with statutory requirements under the Partnership Act to escape liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside a High Court order quashing proceedings and emphasised that non-compliance with Section 72 obligations leaves retired partners exposed to criminal liability for dishonoured cheques.

Cover image for the article: Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

01 May 2025

6

Min Read

Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

The RBI has released the Draft Co-Lending Arrangements Directions, 2025, proposing a unified, market-enabling framework for regulated entities. The draft aims to streamline risk-sharing, pricing, and borrower protections across digital and traditional lending partnerships while replacing fragmented earlier guidelines. This explainer highlights key provisions, compliance expectations, and systemic implications.