Profile
Shivam Mishra is an Associate at Metalegal Advocates and advises clients on indirect taxation, economic offences, insolvency, and regulatory disputes. His practice focuses on GST litigation, anti-money laundering proceedings, insolvency matters, and regulatory enforcement actions.
A graduate of Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, Shivam combines strong legal analysis with meticulous attention to factual and procedural detail. He regularly assists clients in navigating complex tax disputes, regulatory investigations, and contentious proceedings before various judicial and quasi-judicial forums.
His practice is distinguished by a structured and detail-oriented approach, enabling clients to effectively address regulatory challenges and litigation risks.
Education
LL.M. (Intellectual Property Rights), Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University
B.A. LL.B., Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University
Professional Affiliations
Bar Council of Uttar Pradesh |
Practice
Economic Offences | Litigation | Tax Law
Key Assignments
Advising and assisting clients in GST disputes, including tax demands, assessments, appellate proceedings, and regulatory enforcement actions.
Assisting clients in proceedings under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, including adjudication, appellate, and prosecution-related matters.
Supporting insolvency and restructuring matters arising under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Advising clients in matters involving provisional attachment, regulatory investigations, and financial compliance issues.
Assisting in strategic dispute resolution and regulatory risk management across taxation and enforcement matters.
2025-04-28T10:23:31.979Z
5
min read
Supreme Court: PMLA Is a Continuing Offence, Retrospectivity and Threshold Challenges Held Legally Unsustainable
SC upholds PMLA’s continuing offence doctrine, rejecting retrospective and threshold-based challenges to money laundering prosecutions.
2025-05-05T19:32:20.875Z
6
min read
AT-PMLA Clarifies Limits of Attachment: Seizure and Attachment Can Coexist, But Cannot Exceed Scheduled Offence Proceeds
The Appellate Tribunal under PMLA has clarified that while seizure and attachment can co-exist, the ED cannot attach property beyond the proceeds quantified in the scheduled offence. In Barik Biswas v. ED, the Tribunal reaffirmed key safeguards—procedural and proportionality-based—while reiterating that attachment must have a direct or equivalent nexus to the predicate offence under PMLA.
2025-02-26T18:30:00Z
6
min read
From the Finance Act, 2021 to the Decisions in Ashish Agarwal & Rajeev Bansal: Delhi HC Clarifies Key Aspects of Reassessment under the Income-tax Act
The Delhi High Court clarifies reassessment timelines, approvals, and JAO powers under the faceless regime post Finance Act, 2021.