In a significant move towards regulatory consolidation and clarity, the Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’), in exercise of powers conferred under ss. 10(4) and 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 (‘FEMA’) and under s. 45W of the Reserve Bank of India, Act 1934 (‘RBI Act’) has issued the Master Direction - RBI (Non-resident Investment in Debt Instruments) Directions, 2025 (‘Master Directions’)[i] to consolidate the directions issued by it under various regulations[ii] as also directions under s. 45W of the RBI Act, at various times, relating to non-resident investment in debt instruments in India. The 2025 Directions aim to streamline the framework for non-resident investments in Indian debt markets by consolidating regulations and enhancing transparency in foreign investor participation.
Key Provisions of the Master Directions
1. Regulatory Framework and Applicability: The Master Direction derives its authority from ss. 10(4) and 11(1) of FEMA and s. 45W of the RBI Act. It applies to all transactions undertaken by eligible non-residents in debt instruments and takes immediate effect.
2. Investment Channels for Non-Resident Investors: The Master Direction prescribes four primary channels through which non-residents can invest in Indian debt instruments:
a. General Route: This route is available to foreign portfolio investors (FPIs) for investments in government securities ('G-Secs') and corporate debt securities. It is subject to macroprudential limits and specified investment ceilings. The maximum short-term investment (maturity up to 1 year) is 30% of total FPI investments in each category.
b. Voluntary Retention Route ('VRR'): In this route, the FPIs committing to a minimum 3-year retention period are exempt from macroprudential restrictions. Investments made following this route must be at least 75% of the Committed Portfolio Size (CPS) at all times. This route allows additional flexibility, such as reinvestment of coupons without constraints.
c. Fully Accessible Route ('FAR'): This route is open to FPIs, Non-Resident Indians (NRIs), Overseas Citizens of India (OCIs), and other notified non-residents. There are no restrictions on investments in specified Central G-Secs in this route. This route enables unrestricted participation in sovereign debt instruments.
d. Sovereign Green Bonds Investment in International Financial Services Centre ('IFSC'): Eligible foreign investors can participate in the trading and settlement of Sovereign Green Bonds in India’s IFSC. It aims to boost sustainable financing and align India with global green investment trends.
3. Key Investment Restrictions and Relaxations: The Master Direction establishes specific limits and conditions for different investment instruments:
G-Secs:
Minimum Residual Maturity: No minimum residual maturity requirement for FPIs in Central and State G-Secs.
Security-wise Limit: FPI investments in any single Central G-Sec should not exceed 30% of the outstanding stock of that security.
Concentration Limit: FPIs (including related FPIs) can invest up to 15% of the prevailing investment limit for long-term FPIs and up to 10% for other FPIs in Central and State G-Secs.
Monitoring by the Clearing Corporation of India Ltd. ('CCIL'): The CCIL will track the utilisation of investment limits in G-Secs.
Corporate Debt Securities:
Minimum Residual Maturity: FPIs can only invest in corporate debt securities with an original or residual maturity of over one year.
Prohibited Investments: FPIs cannot invest in:
Corporate debt securities with an optionality clause exercisable within a year.
Debt mutual fund schemes with a maturity or Macaulay duration of less than one year.
Partly paid debt instruments.
Amortised corporate debt instruments with a maturity of up to one year.
Short-term Investment Limit:
FPIs can invest in corporate debt securities with residual maturity of up to 1 year, but the limit should not exceed 30% of the total investment in corporate debt securities.
The limit is also applicable on an end-of-day basis, with exceptions for investments made on or before 27.04.2018 and those made between 08.07.2022 and 31.10.2022.
Issue-wise Limit: FPI investments, including related FPIs, should not exceed 50% of any single corporate debt security issue.
Concentration Limit: Investment in corporate debt securities by FPI (including related FPIs) should not exceed 15% of the prevailing investment limit for long-term FPIs and 10% for other FPIs.
End-use Restrictions: Investment in unlisted corporate debt securities, in the form of non-convertible debentures/bonds, is subject to end-use restrictions (real estate, capital markets, land purchase).
‘To be Listed’ Corporate Debt Securities: FPIs can invest in unlisted corporate debt securities that are expected to be listed. If these securities are not listed within the prescribed time frame by SEBI, the FPI must sell them to the issuer or a third party.
Exemptions: Some conditions, such as minimum residual maturity, short-term investment limit, and issue-wise limit, do not apply to specific types of debt instruments, including:
Security Receipts issued by asset reconstruction companies.
Debt instruments under corporate insolvency resolution.
Default bonds.
Utilisation Monitoring: The depositories registered with the SEBI will monitor the FPI investment limits for corporate debt securities.
Primary Responsibility: The responsibility of ensuring compliance with all applicable limits for investment in Government and corporate debt securities rests with FPIs and custodians.
4. Reporting, Violations, and Enforcement: To ensure regulatory adherence, the Master Direction includes stringent reporting and enforcement provisions:
a. Reporting Obligations:
All OTC trades in G-Secs by FPIs (except NDS-OM web module transactions) must be reported to NDS-OM within three hours after the close of trading hours.
Custodians and depositories must ensure compliance with investment caps.
b. Enforcement Mechanism
Breach of investment limits will result in the reversal of transactions.
SEBI may initiate regulatory action against FPIs violating compliance norms.
Minor violations can be rectified within five working days; otherwise, custodians must report them to the SEBI.
Our Analysis
The RBI’s Master Direction marks a significant regulatory simplification, consolidating decades of fragmented circulars into a single, coherent framework. By reducing investment restrictions under the FAR and VRR, the RBI seeks to enhance India’s attractiveness as a destination for foreign debt investment, fostering deeper liquidity in bond markets.
Impact on Stakeholders:
FPIs - Enhanced flexibility and reduced compliance burden, particularly under FAR and VRR.
Multilateral Institutions & Long-term Investors - Encouraged participation with exemptions on certain restrictions.
Domestic Bond Market - Improved liquidity and diversified investor participation.
Regulatory Oversight - Enhanced monitoring by CCIL and SEBI ensures transparency.
However, some challenges remain, such as:
Restrictions on corporate debt investment may deter non-resident investors from seeking higher returns.
Compliance with monitoring mechanisms could increase procedural burdens on custodians.
Overall, the RBI’s move is a progressive step towards harmonizing India’s foreign investment regime in debt instruments, aligning with global best practices, and bolstering investor confidence.
End Notes
[i] Notification No. FMRD.FMD.11/14.01.006/2024-25 dated 07.01.2025.
[ii] Foreign Exchange Management (Permissible Capital Accounts Transactions) Regulations, 2000 notified vide Notification No. FEMA 1 /2000-RB dated May 03, 2000, as amended from time to time; Foreign Exchange Management (Borrowing and Lending) Regulations, 2018 notified vide Notification No. FEMA 3(R)/2018-RB dated December 17, 2018, as amended from time to time; and Foreign Exchange Management (Debt Instruments) Regulations, 2019 notified vide Notification No. FEMA. 396/2019-RB dated 17.10.2019, as amended from time to time.
Authored by the Metalegal Editorial Board, the views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal advice or opinion.
More Insights
24-07-2026
10
min read
‘Shylockian’ Lending is ‘Squeezing of Blood’: NCLT Moves Beyond Debt & Default to Reject a Section 7 Application
In a rare departure from the conventional debt-and-default enquiry under section 7 of the IBC, the NCLT, Kochi Bench rejected the financial creditors' petition after characterizing the underlying arrangement as a ‘Shylockian system’ of lending. This court ruling discusses Shylockian lending and examines the strength of the Tribunal's focus on the economic substance of the transaction against established legal principles governing admission under section 7 of the IBC.
10-07-2026
7
min read
Faceless Reassessment after S. 147A: What the Supreme Court Did – and Did Not – Decide
The Supreme Court's decision in Tej Pratap Singh does not settle the JAO–FAO controversy. Following Parliament's retrospective insertion of s. 147A, it remands the issue to the High Courts for fresh consideration. Faceless reassessment was never merely about moving tax files from paper to portal; it fundamentally changed the statutory authority responsible for communicating with the taxpayer, examining the record, drafting the order and completing the assessment. The real question now is how far a retrospective legislative clarification can go.
22-06-2026
8
min read
Claim Admission is not Debt Acknowledgement: Supreme Court on RP’s Role & Limitation under the IBC
Can admission of a claim by a Resolution Professional extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act? In Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, holding that claim admission during CIRP is merely a statutory claim-verification process and not an acknowledgement of debt. The ruling clarifies the RP’s non-adjudicatory role and reinforces important principles governing limitation under the IBC.