Background
The Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) continues its proactive approach to regulate the digital lending landscape, as evidenced by its recent issuance of draft guidelines on ‘Digital Lending- Transparency in Aggregation of Loan Products from Multiple Lenders.’ This circular, notified by RBI via a press release dated 26.04.2024[i], builds upon the framework established in the ‘Guidelines on Digital Lending’ issued on 02.09.2022 and the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated 08.12.2023.
Applicability of the Draft Circular
The draft circular is designed to address the aggregation of loan products by lending service providers (‘LSP’), particularly focusing on ensuring transparency and consumer-centricity in the digital lending process.
Key Highlights of the Draft Guidelines[ii]
Enhanced Transparency: The guidelines emphasize the importance of providing borrowers with clear and comprehensive information about potential lenders. LSPs are required to offer a digital view of all available loan offers from willing lenders, enabling borrowers to make informed decisions.
Consistent Approach: LSPs are instructed to adopt a consistent approach in ascertaining the willingness of lenders to offer a loan. This approach must be transparently disclosed on their respective websites.
Comprehensive Information via Digital View: The digital view presented to borrowers should include essential details such as the names of the regulating entities (‘RE’) or the lenders, loan amounts, tenor of the loan, Annual Percentage Rates (‘APR’) and other key terms and conditions. Additionally, links to the Key Facts Statement (‘KFS’) for each lending entity should be provided for further clarity.
Unbiased Presentation: LSPs are prohibited from promoting or favouring specific RE or loan products through biased or deceptive practices. The content displayed must be unbiased and free from any deceptive patterns designed to mislead borrowers.
Conclusion
The issuance of these draft guidelines underscores RBI’s commitment to fostering transparency and accountability in the digital lending ecosystem. By empowering borrowers with access to comprehensive information, these guidelines aim to promote fair lending practices and protect the interests of consumers. Stakeholders are encouraged to review the draft guidelines carefully and provide feedback to RBI before the effective date, which will be announced shortly.
End Notes
[i] Press Release No. 2024-2025/194, dated 26.4.2024.
[ii] RBI Circular DOR.STR.REC.*/21.07.001/2024-25, para 3
Attaching the press release and draft guidelines for ready reference:
2024 - Draft Guidelines on Digital Lending.PDF
Authored by Muskaan Jain, Associate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.
More Insights
22-06-2026
8
min read
Claim Admission is not Debt Acknowledgement: Supreme Court on RP’s Role & Limitation under the IBC
Can admission of a claim by a Resolution Professional extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act? In Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, holding that claim admission during CIRP is merely a statutory claim-verification process and not an acknowledgement of debt. The ruling clarifies the RP’s non-adjudicatory role and reinforces important principles governing limitation under the IBC.
2026-04-23
18
min read
Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Indirect Tax Laws: A Barrier to Justice?
Mandatory pre-deposit has become a defining feature of indirect tax litigation, balancing revenue protection with access to appellate remedies. While the shift to a fixed statutory framework has improved procedural efficiency, it also raises concerns regarding financial barriers and effective access to justice. This insight examines the legal evolution, judicial interpretation, and practical implications of the regime.
2026-04-20
10
min read
Legal Strategy in Startup Ecosystems: Risk Mitigation and Value Maximisation from Formation to Exit
Legal structuring across the startup lifecycle extends beyond compliance to shape valuation, governance, and investor confidence. From intellectual property protection and entity selection to funding arrangements and exit mechanisms, each stage involves critical legal considerations that determine risk allocation and long-term scalability within a regulated framework.