Introduction
The Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’), through its recent Circular[i] dated 07.06.2024, made an amendment to the Master Direction - Reserve Bank of India (Interest Rate on Deposits) Directions, 2016[ii] (‘Master Direction’). The amendment specifically pertains to the definition and threshold of ‘Bulk Deposits’ for all Scheduled Commercial Banks (‘SCBs’), Small Finance Banks (‘SFBs’) and Local Area Banks (‘LABs).
Key Highlights
a. Revised Definition of Bulk Deposits:
The definition of ‘Bulk Deposits’ (defined in paragraph 3(a)(i) of the Master Direction) has been revised for all SCBs (excluding Regional Rural Banks (RRBs)), SFBs, and LABs.
‘Bulk Deposit’ now means:
For SCBs (excluding RRBs) and SFBs: Single Rupee term deposits of Rupees three crore and above.
For LABs: Single Rupee term deposits of Rupees one crore and above, applicable in the same manner as for RRBs.
These instructions have been issued under the powers conferred by s. 35A of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949.
b. Applicability
The revised instructions are applicable to all SCBs (excluding RRBs), SFBs and LABs.
c. Commencement
The revised definition, along with instructions, comes into force with immediate effect.
Our Analysis
The revised bulk deposit thresholds substantially elevate banks’ capacity to handle large deposits, enhancing asset liability management and fostering greater financial stability. For SCBs (excluding RRBs) and SFBs, the limit has been raised from Rs. 2 crores to Rs. 3 crores, accommodating larger transaction volumes and promoting efficient capital allocation. For LABs, the alignment with RRBs at a Rs. 1 crore threshold simplifies regulatory compliance and operational processes, supporting administrative ease and uniformity across banking sectors. Reflecting and responding to market growth, these updated limits facilitate improved liquidity management and adapt to the evolving scale of economic transactions, crucial for a dynamic economy.
End Notes
[i] CIRCULAR NO. DOR.SPE.REC.NO.24/13.03.00/2024-25
[ii] Master Direction DBR.Dir.No.84/13.03.00/2015-16
Authored by Pratima Ajmera, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.
AUTHORED BY
More Insights
24-07-2026
10
min read
‘Shylockian’ Lending is ‘Squeezing of Blood’: NCLT Moves Beyond Debt & Default to Reject a Section 7 Application
In a rare departure from the conventional debt-and-default enquiry under section 7 of the IBC, the NCLT, Kochi Bench rejected the financial creditors' petition after characterizing the underlying arrangement as a ‘Shylockian system’ of lending. This court ruling discusses Shylockian lending and examines the strength of the Tribunal's focus on the economic substance of the transaction against established legal principles governing admission under section 7 of the IBC.
10-07-2026
7
min read
Faceless Reassessment after S. 147A: What the Supreme Court Did – and Did Not – Decide
The Supreme Court's decision in Tej Pratap Singh does not settle the JAO–FAO controversy. Following Parliament's retrospective insertion of s. 147A, it remands the issue to the High Courts for fresh consideration. Faceless reassessment was never merely about moving tax files from paper to portal; it fundamentally changed the statutory authority responsible for communicating with the taxpayer, examining the record, drafting the order and completing the assessment. The real question now is how far a retrospective legislative clarification can go.
22-06-2026
8
min read
Claim Admission is not Debt Acknowledgement: Supreme Court on RP’s Role & Limitation under the IBC
Can admission of a claim by a Resolution Professional extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act? In Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, holding that claim admission during CIRP is merely a statutory claim-verification process and not an acknowledgement of debt. The ruling clarifies the RP’s non-adjudicatory role and reinforces important principles governing limitation under the IBC.