Cover image for the article: Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

09 Apr 2025

Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

09 Apr 2025

Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

09 Apr 2025

Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

2

Min Read

Introduction  

The Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (‘MSMEs’), through a Notification[i], has amended the existing criteria for classifying enterprises as Micro, Small, and Medium under s. 7 of the MSME Development Act, 2006 (‘Act’). The amendments revise the threshold limits for investment in plant and machinery/equipment and turnover, effective from 01.04.2025.

Background

Earlier, the classification of MSMEs was based on investment and turnover thresholds as notified in the earlier Notification[ii]. Based on the recommendations of the Advisory Committee constituted under the Act, the Central Government has enhanced these thresholds to broaden MSME coverage and enable larger enterprises to avail MSME benefits.

Revised Classification Criteria

The following table summarises the revised investment and turnover limits for MSMEs classification:


Illustration for “The following table summarises the revised investment and turnover limits for MSMEs classification:” in the article “Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds”

Our Analysis

The amendments to the earlier Notification, as outlined in the amended Notification, represent a significant policy shift aimed at broadening the scope of enterprises qualifying as Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises under s. 7 of the Act. By enhancing the investment and turnover thresholds, the Central Government has aligned the classification criteria with prevailing economic conditions, inflationary trends, and evolving industry demands. This revision is expected to extend statutory benefits under various schemes, such as priority sector lending, tax concessions, and public procurement incentives, to a wider base of enterprises. The revised thresholds are also likely to improve the flow of institutional credit to mid-sized enterprises that were previously excluded from the MSME ambit, thereby reducing their reliance on high-cost informal financing.

Moreover, the broadened eligibility criteria necessitate focused outreach and capacity-building efforts to ensure that newly eligible enterprises are aware of, and able to access, the benefits under the Udyam registration framework.

However, enterprises seeking reclassification are required to update their Udyam Registration in a timely manner in accordance with the revised thresholds to remain compliant and continue to be eligible for benefits under the Act.

End Notes

[i] No. S.O. 1364(E) dated 21.03.2025.

[ii] No. S.O. 2119(E) dated 26.06.2020.

Authored by Onam Singhal, Chartered Accountant at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinions

More Insights

Cover image for the article: The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

24 Feb 2026

12

Min Read

The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

This essay examines where preventive law has overreached: in compliance frameworks divorced from the actual causes of contraventions, in the systematic reversal of the burden of proof, and most acutely, in the routine deployment of provisional attachment as a pre-adjudicatory punishment. The law designed to address the fear of harm has itself become an object of fear. Preventive law has emerged as the legislature's response to the complexity, scale, and pace of modern business activity and, in jurisdictions like India, as a scaffolding for laws that lack organic social consensus.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable Under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

30 May 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

The Supreme Court, in Shivappa Reddy v. S. Srinivasan, has reaffirmed that partners retiring from a firm must strictly comply with statutory requirements under the Partnership Act to escape liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside a High Court order quashing proceedings and emphasised that non-compliance with Section 72 obligations leaves retired partners exposed to criminal liability for dishonoured cheques.

Cover image for the article: Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

01 May 2025

6

Min Read

Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

The RBI has released the Draft Co-Lending Arrangements Directions, 2025, proposing a unified, market-enabling framework for regulated entities. The draft aims to streamline risk-sharing, pricing, and borrower protections across digital and traditional lending partnerships while replacing fragmented earlier guidelines. This explainer highlights key provisions, compliance expectations, and systemic implications.