Cover image for the article: Finance Ministry enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

09 Apr 2023

Finance Ministry Enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: Finance Ministry enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

09 Apr 2023

Finance Ministry Enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

2

Min Read

Cover image for the article: Finance Ministry enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

09 Apr 2023

Finance Ministry Enhances Beneficial Owner Definitions & Disclosure Rules under PMLA

2

Min Read

Introduction

In a recent move to combat benami activities and operations of clandestine firms, The Ministry of Finance recently issued a notification[i], under the Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 that will be known as the Prevention of Money Laundering (Maintenance of Records) 2nd Amendment Rules, 2023 (‘Rules’). This notification widened the ambit of a beneficial owner in a partnership firm and introduced amendments concerning trustee disclosures.

Primary Amendments 

  • The reporting entities are now only permitted to designate individuals at the management level as Principal Officers under r. 2(f) of the Rules. This ensures that only individuals with sufficient authority and oversight handle compliance matters.

  • In the case of a partnership firm, according to the amended rules, a natural person holding a stake or with ownership exceeding 10% of the capital or profits of a partnership will now be considered a ‘beneficial owner’ under r. 9(3)(b) of the Rules. Previously, the threshold for determining beneficial ownership in a partnership firm was set at 15% of the partnership’s capital or profits.

  • Further, an individual who does not possess ownership or entitlement to more than 10% (earlier 15%) of the partnership’s capital or a profit but exercises the right to control the management or policy decision of the partnership through alternative methods, will come under the ambit of a beneficial owner. This has been done by adding an explanation that clarifies that the term ‘control’ includes the right to control management or policy decisions.

  • Additionally, the notification highlights that concerning trusts under r. 9(10) of the Rules, the reporting entities are obligated to ensure that trustees disclose their status at the time of initiation of an account-based relationship or when conducting transactions equivalent to or exceeding Rs. 50,000 or any international money transfer operations as per r. 9(1)(b) of the Rules. This emphasises the importance of trustee disclosures in trust-based relationships to enhance transparency and accountability.

  • Under r. 10(3) of the Rules, reporting entities are required to maintain records of clients’ identities, including the outcomes of any analysis conducted as part of client due diligence (under r. 9) or the maintenance of transaction records (under r. 3). Amendments to r. 10 of the Rules expand the scope of the information to be maintained, potentially providing more comprehensive insights into potential money laundering activities.

Analysis

The recent Ministry of Finance notification represents a significant step forward in combatting benami activities and strengthening anti-money laundering efforts. By expanding the definition of beneficial ownership and reinforcing trustee disclosures, these amendments underscore the commitment to financial transparency and accountability.

The responsibility now falls on reporting entities to diligently adhere to these updated guidelines. Their strict compliance will play a pivotal role in safeguarding our financial landscape’s integrity. Effective implementation relies on continued collaboration between regulatory authorities, businesses, and financial professionals.

End Note

[i] The PML (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2023, Central Government Notification GSR 652(E) dt. 04.09.2023.

Authored by Purvi Garg, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.

More Insights

Cover image for the article: Clean Before the Crime? Attachment of Properties Acquired Before the Commission of the Scheduled Offence under the PMLA

04 Nov 2025

15

Min Read

Clean before the Crime? Attachment of Properties Acquired before the Commission of the Scheduled Offence under the PMLA

Can property acquired before a crime be seized under the PMLA? This article examines how Indian courts have interpreted the concept of “proceeds of crime,” balancing enforcement power with constitutional safeguards, and compares global confiscation regimes to determine where the legal line truly lies.

Cover image for the article: No Conflict with the CrPC: Supreme Court Affirms Right to Fair Disclosure in PMLA Cases in Light of Reverse Burden on Accused

19 May 2025

10

Min Read

No Conflict with the CrPC: Supreme Court Affirms Right to Fair Disclosure in PMLA Cases in Light of Reverse Burden on Accused

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court affirmed that accused persons under the PMLA are entitled to access all documents seized or filed with the prosecution, regardless of reliance by the ED. The Court ruled this disclosure is essential to uphold Article 21 and harmonised CrPC procedures with PMLA's special framework, reinforcing procedural fairness even in economic offences involving reverse burden clauses.

Cover image for the article: [AT-PMLA] Property Attachment Upheld Following Illegal Call Interception at NSE

06 Apr 2025

4

Min Read

[AT-PMLA] Property Attachment Upheld Following Illegal Call Interception at NSE

The SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal has upheld the Enforcement Directorate’s attachment of iSec Services’ assets, following findings of unauthorised call interception at NSE. The Tribunal held that the actions amounted to cheating and money laundering, triggering provisions under the IPC and PMLA. The judgment underscores that fraudulent conduct disguised as formal contracts cannot escape penal consequences under Indian law.