Introduction
The Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’) has recently introduced the CCI (Determination of Turnover or Income) Regulations, 2024[i]* *(‘Regulations’). These regulations, coming into effect from 06.03.2024, aim to provide clarity and uniformity in determining turnover or income for enterprises and individuals under the purview of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘Act’). Understanding these regulations is crucial for businesses and individuals operating within India’s competitive landscape.
Determination of Turnover or Income for Enterprises
For enterprises, turnover or income includes sales value and other operating revenue as per audited financial statements, excluding certain components such as other income, indirect taxes, trade discounts, and intragroup sales. Where consolidated financial statements are required under the Companies Act, 2013, the turnover shall be based on such statements. In the absence of audited financials, the turnover can be certified by a statutory auditor or a Chartered Accountant, supported by an affidavit. Foreign currency turnover should be converted to Indian rupees using specified criteria.
Determination of Income for Individuals
For individuals, income is deemed as the gross total income as per the income tax returns filed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, with specific exclusions for income from house property and capital gains. In instances where tax returns are absent or filed across multiple jurisdictions, a Chartered Accountant’s certification, supplemented by an affidavit, serves as the basis for income determination. Further, individuals not required to file income tax returns shall certify their total income through a Chartered Accountant, supported by an affidavit.
Removal of Difficulties
The regulations empower the CCI to address unforeseen situations or interpretational ambiguities not explicitly covered within the regulatory framework. Decisions regarding matters not addressed in these Regulations or their interpretation shall be made by the CCI, and such decisions shall be binding. This ensures flexibility and enables the CCI to resolve emerging turnover or income determination challenges promptly.
Conclusion
The Regulations represent a significant step towards streamlining the computation of turnover or income for entities and individuals subject to the Act. By providing clear guidelines and procedures, these regulations enhance transparency, consistency, and efficiency in the enforcement of competition law in India. Adherence to these regulations is crucial for enterprises and individuals to ensure compliance with the Act and to foster a competitive business environment conducive to innovation and consumer welfare.
End Note
[i] Notification No. B-14011/2/2024-ATD-II dated 06.03.2024.
Authored by Nitish Solanki, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.
More Insights
25-08-2026
12
min read
A Game of Treasure Hunt: Service of GST Notices and Orders under S. 169 of the CGST Act and the Emerging Split Among High Courts
Luxmi Traders addresses a fundamental question in GST adjudication: can a notice or order be treated as duly served merely because it is uploaded on the Common Portal? The Punjab and Haryana High Court held that portal-only service, absent the requisite statutory and notified basis, cannot by itself defeat a taxpayer’s remedies. With Madras and Allahabad adopting different approaches and Delhi subsequently applying Luxmi Traders, the issue reflects a significant divergence in judicial approach awaiting authoritative resolution.
24-07-2026
10
min read
‘Shylockian’ Lending is ‘Squeezing of Blood’: NCLT Moves Beyond Debt & Default to Reject a Section 7 Application
In a rare departure from the conventional debt-and-default enquiry under section 7 of the IBC, the NCLT, Kochi Bench rejected the financial creditors' petition after characterizing the underlying arrangement as a ‘Shylockian system’ of lending. This court ruling discusses Shylockian lending and examines the strength of the Tribunal's focus on the economic substance of the transaction against established legal principles governing admission under section 7 of the IBC.
10-07-2026
7
min read
Faceless Reassessment after S. 147A: What the Supreme Court Did – and Did Not – Decide
The Supreme Court's decision in Tej Pratap Singh does not settle the JAO–FAO controversy. Following Parliament's retrospective insertion of s. 147A, it remands the issue to the High Courts for fresh consideration. Faceless reassessment was never merely about moving tax files from paper to portal; it fundamentally changed the statutory authority responsible for communicating with the taxpayer, examining the record, drafting the order and completing the assessment. The real question now is how far a retrospective legislative clarification can go.