Introduction
The Competition Commission of India (‘CCI’) has enacted significant amendments through the CCI (General) Amendment Regulations, 2024[i], (‘the Regulations’). These amendments effective from 12.01.2024, amend the existing CCI (General) Regulations, 2009.
Definition of ‘Interlocutory Application’
A notable addition is the introduction of the term ‘Interlocutory Application’ (‘IA’) as a new clause (fa) in reg. 2. This term has been specifically defined with reference to applications made to the Commission in cases under s. 19 of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘Act of 2002’). It is important to note that this definition excludes applications made in response to any order or directive from the Commission. This addition marks a significant clarification in the procedural aspects of handling cases under the Act of 2002.
Registration and Scrutiny of IAs
Reg. 15, as amended in the parent regulations of 2009, introduces a new sub-reg. (6) focusing on the registration and scrutiny of IAs. This amendment mandates a formal process for the registration and numbering of each application. Additionally, it requires any defects in the application to be communicated to the applicant within seven days. The applicant then has five days from receiving this intimation to correct the defects notified. Failure to do so will result in the application being deemed invalid, emphasizing the need for accuracy and promptness in the submission process.
Amended Fee Structure for IAs
Reg. 49 (1A) introduces a new fee structure for IAs, a key change in the parent regulations of 2009. Under the new sub-reg. (1A), each IA submitted as per reg. 15(6) must include proof of payment of the applicable fee. This fee varies based on the entity type filing the application, specifying fees for individuals or HUFs to be Rs. 500, Rs. 1,000 for NGOs, consumer associations, co-operative societies, and trusts, Rs. 1,000 for firms or companies, including one-person companies with a turnover up to Rs. 2 crores, and Rs. 5,000 for all other cases. This amendment is aimed at standardizing the application process and ensuring a level of commitment from the entities filing these applications.
Conclusion
The amendments reflect the continuous efforts of the CCI to streamline and enhance the regulatory processes governing competition law. The emphasis on the proper filing and scrutiny of IAs, coupled with the introduction of a fee structure, aims to ensure efficiency and accountability in the adjudication process.
This notification serves as a vital resource for legal professionals, businesses, and stakeholders, and it is crucial for relevant parties to be well-acquainted with these changes for effective navigation within the updated legal framework.
End Note
[i] Vide Notification No. (01 of 2024) L-3(2)/Regl. -Gen. (Amdt.)/2024/CCI dated 12.01.2024.
Authored by Nitish Solanki, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinion.
More Insights
22-06-2026
8
min read
Claim Admission is not Debt Acknowledgement: Supreme Court on RP’s Role & Limitation under the IBC
Can admission of a claim by a Resolution Professional extend limitation under section 18 of the Limitation Act? In Shankar Khandelwal v. Omkara Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court answered this question in the negative, holding that claim admission during CIRP is merely a statutory claim-verification process and not an acknowledgement of debt. The ruling clarifies the RP’s non-adjudicatory role and reinforces important principles governing limitation under the IBC.
2026-04-23
18
min read
Mandatory Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Indirect Tax Laws: A Barrier to Justice?
Mandatory pre-deposit has become a defining feature of indirect tax litigation, balancing revenue protection with access to appellate remedies. While the shift to a fixed statutory framework has improved procedural efficiency, it also raises concerns regarding financial barriers and effective access to justice. This insight examines the legal evolution, judicial interpretation, and practical implications of the regime.
2026-04-20
10
min read
Legal Strategy in Startup Ecosystems: Risk Mitigation and Value Maximisation from Formation to Exit
Legal structuring across the startup lifecycle extends beyond compliance to shape valuation, governance, and investor confidence. From intellectual property protection and entity selection to funding arrangements and exit mechanisms, each stage involves critical legal considerations that determine risk allocation and long-term scalability within a regulated framework.