Stone columns and an ornate ceiling beneath a gridded skylight

09 Apr 2025

SEBI Cracks down on Anchor Trading: Declares CNBC Anchor’s Conduct as Abuse of Market Privilege

4

Min Read

Stone columns and an ornate ceiling beneath a gridded skylight

09 Apr 2025

SEBI Cracks down on Anchor Trading: Declares CNBC Anchor’s Conduct as Abuse of Market Privilege

4

Min Read

Stone columns and an ornate ceiling beneath a gridded skylight

09 Apr 2025

SEBI Cracks down on Anchor Trading: Declares CNBC Anchor’s Conduct as Abuse of Market Privilege

4

Min Read

Introduction

In a striking decision in Hemant Ghai, In re,[i] which resonates across both the securities market and media ethics, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has delivered a comprehensive ruling against former CNBC Awaaz anchor Hemant Ghai, his family members, and related intermediaries. The Order reveals the disturbing misuse of media privilege, where trading accounts linked to the anchor’s family were used to front-run stock recommendations made on national television. The ruling underlines SEBI’s vigilance in preserving market integrity and ensuring that investors’ trust is not exploited by those in privileged positions.

The order further highlights a foundational tenet of securities regulation: when material non-public information is exploited for personal gain, whether sourced from corporate insiders or the media, it shakes the very confidence on which capital markets are built.

Brief Facts

  • Hemant Ghai (‘Noticee No. 1’) was a news anchor at CNBC Awaaz, a popular Hindi business news channel. A strong correlation was observed between Noticee No. 1’s on-air stock recommendations and the trades executed in the accounts of his wife (‘Noticee No. 2’) and mother (‘Noticee No. 3’).

  • An ad-interim ex-parte Order was passed in 2021, whereby Rs. 2.95 crore was impounded as illegal gains from Buy Today Sell Tomorrow (‘BTST’) trades and further directions were passed, restricting the Noticees market access. SEBI’s investigation was later expanded to cover both BTST and intraday trades made from 01.01.2018 to 13.01.2021.

  • A show cause notice (SCN) was issued after reinvestigation, alleging misuse of material non-public information and fraudulent trade practices. Additional entities, MAS Consultancy (‘Noticee No. 4’), the authorised person and Motilal Oswal Financial Services Ltd. (‘Noticee No. 5’),  the stockbroker for Noticee No. 1, 2 and 3, were added as additional Noticees.

  • Evidence showed a consistent price and volume surge post-recommendations made by Noticee No. 1, revealing the material impact of his televised tips. Investigations confirmed that Noticee No. 1 had operational control over Noticee No. 2 and Noticee No. 3’s trading and bank accounts. Call data records (CDR) and email evidence confirmed frequent communications between Noticee No. 1 and Noticee No. 4’s dealers during trading hours.

  • Despite being an anchor, Noticee No. 1 received profits from the trades and submitted fabricated trade instruction documents to SEBI. Trading activity in his wife’s account dropped sharply after restrictions were imposed, suggesting trades were driven by access to privileged information.

Decision of SEBI

  • After examining the facts of the case, SEBI, in exercise of the powers conferred upon it under s. 19 read with ss. 11(1), 11(4), 11(4A) and 11B read with s. 15-I of the SEBI Act, 1992 (‘SEBI Act’) and r. 5 of the Adjudication Rules, 1995 passed the following directions:

    • Noticee No. 1 to 3 were barred from accessing the securities market for 5 years.

    • Noticee No. 1 and 2 were directed to jointly disgorge unlawful gains of Rs. 6.15 crore including interest to the Investor Protection and Education Fund (IEPF).

    • Noticee No. 4 and 5 were fined for regulatory lapses.

    • Noticee No. 4 was held guilty of aiding and abetting fraudulent trades, and Noticee No. 5 was held liable for supervisory negligence.

    • Accordingly, Noticees 1, 2 and 4 were made liable to pay a monetary penalty under s. 15HA of the SEBI Act, and a penalty under s. 15HB of the SEBI Act was also imposed on Noticee Nos. 4 and 5.

  • SEBI found that Noticee No. 1 undertook trading based on material non-public information, his own upcoming recommendations, thus violating SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003 (‘PFUTP Regulations, 2003’).

  • It was also observed that the analysis showed consistent price and volume surges following Noticee No. 1’s stock picks on shows like ‘Stock 20-20’ and ‘Kal Ka Khiladi Aaj’.

  • It found that anchors at CNBC, including the Noticee No. 1, had autonomy in selecting stocks. Further, evidence showed selections were made before market close on T-1 day. It was also found that recommendations by co-anchors were also available to Noticee No. 1 prior to airing, which was confirmed via emails, segment formats, and witness statements.

  • On the role of Noticee No. 4, it was found that it failed to maintain mandatory pre-trade documentation, submitted fabricated Order Instruction Sheets, and allowed unauthorised trading. Noticee No. 4 was found complicit in aiding Noticee No. 1 by permitting trades and falsifying records, violating multiple SEBI circulars.

  • On the role of Noticee No. 5, SEBI observed that it failed in its supervisory role, ignoring alerts and continuing association with Noticee No. 4 despite red flags. Noticee No. 5 was also found negligent in monitoring Noticee No. 4’s activities but not complicit in fraud.

  • Based on IMSI, OTP, App ID data, and linked communications, SEBI concluded that Noticee No. 1 had effective control over Noticee No. 2 and Noticee No. 3’s accounts.

  • SEBI cited the ‘misappropriation theory’ recognised by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in* Kanaiyalal v. State of MP*[ii] to hold Noticee No. 1 liable for fraud under reg. 3(a), (b), (d) and 4(1) of the PFUTP Regulations.

Our Analysis

SEBI’s ruling offers a landmark exposition of how media influence, when coupled with trading access, can be misused to defraud public investors. The detailed forensic and circumstantial evidence compiled by SEBI, ranging from broadcast patterns to call records and device-level access logs, demonstrates the regulator’s evolving sophistication in tracking market abuse. By identifying that material non-public information can originate not only from corporate insiders but also media anchors, SEBI has expanded the scope of PFUTP enforcement and sent a clear message that regulatory scrutiny applies equally to all market influencers.

The ruling also sheds light on the complicity and lapses within the intermediary framework. Noticee No. 4’s failure to maintain records, its submission of fabricated documents, and Noticee No. 5’s willful blindness to clear red flags expose systemic weaknesses in compliance culture among brokers and their authorised persons. SEBI’s recognition that the privileges of market access come with proportional accountability is crucial to sustain a fair trading ecosystem. This case reflects the regulator’s resolve to crack down on misuse of broadcast influence, a trend likely to see increased monitoring in the age of social media and influencer investing.

End Notes

[i] [2025] 172 taxmann.com 600 (SEBI).

[ii] (2021) 5 SCC 462.

Authored by Prashant Singh, Advocate at Metalegal Advocates. The views expressed are personal and do not constitute legal opinions.

Portrait of Prashant Singh
Portrait of Prashant Singh

AUTHORED BY

Principal Associate

Principal Associate

Principal Associate

More Insights

Cover image for the article: The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

24 Feb 2026

12

Min Read

The Rise of Preventive Law and the Fear of Future Harm

This essay examines where preventive law has overreached: in compliance frameworks divorced from the actual causes of contraventions, in the systematic reversal of the burden of proof, and most acutely, in the routine deployment of provisional attachment as a pre-adjudicatory punishment. The law designed to address the fear of harm has itself become an object of fear. Preventive law has emerged as the legislature's response to the complexity, scale, and pace of modern business activity and, in jurisdictions like India, as a scaffolding for laws that lack organic social consensus.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable Under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

30 May 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court: Retired Partner Still Liable under NI Act if Statutory Formalities Are Not Followed

The Supreme Court, in Shivappa Reddy v. S. Srinivasan, has reaffirmed that partners retiring from a firm must strictly comply with statutory requirements under the Partnership Act to escape liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Court set aside a High Court order quashing proceedings and emphasised that non-compliance with Section 72 obligations leaves retired partners exposed to criminal liability for dishonoured cheques.

Cover image for the article: Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

01 May 2025

6

Min Read

Unifying the Framework & Strengthening Oversight: RBI’s Draft 2025 Directions on Co-Lending Arrangements Explained

The RBI has released the Draft Co-Lending Arrangements Directions, 2025, proposing a unified, market-enabling framework for regulated entities. The draft aims to streamline risk-sharing, pricing, and borrower protections across digital and traditional lending partnerships while replacing fragmented earlier guidelines. This explainer highlights key provisions, compliance expectations, and systemic implications.

Cover image for the article: RBI Issues Draft Directions on Non-Fund Based Credit Facilities: Bridging the Regulatory Gap

01 May 2025

6

Min Read

RBI Issues Draft Directions on Non-Fund Based Credit Facilities: Bridging the Regulatory Gap

The RBI has issued draft directions to regulate Non-Fund Based Credit Facilities such as guarantees, letters of credit, and partial credit enhancements. This write-up provides a detailed overview of the framework, its applicability to banks and NBFCs, the proposed exposure caps, and disclosure requirements, while highlighting the shift towards electronic guarantees and risk-based credit appraisals.

Stone columns and an ornate ceiling beneath a gridded skylight

01 May 2025

7

Min Read

RBI’s Draft Directions on Lending against Gold Collateral, 2025: A Step Toward Harmonised and Responsible Credit Practices

The RBI has released its draft 2025 Directions on lending against gold collateral, proposing a unified, principle-based framework for all regulated entities. These Directions aim to streamline prudential norms, standardise conduct practices, and strengthen consumer protection, while ensuring fair treatment and systemic stability in gold-backed credit markets.

Cover image for the article: Judicial Independence in Statutory Interpretation: US Supreme Court Restores Balance of Power in Administrative Law

28 Apr 2025

5

Min Read

Judicial Independence in Statutory Interpretation: US Supreme Court Restores Balance of Power in Administrative Law

the US Supreme Court has overruled the four-decade-old Chevron doctrine, reasserting that courts—not agencies—hold the ultimate authority to interpret ambiguous statutes. This decision reshapes administrative law, restoring judicial independence under Article III of the US Constitution and carrying persuasive relevance for jurisdictions like India that value a strict separation of powers.

Cover image for the article: SEBI Mandates Stricter Corporate Governance for High Value Debt Listed Entities (HVDLEs)

26 Apr 2025

3

Min Read

SEBI Mandates Stricter Corporate Governance for High Value Debt Listed Entities (HVDLEs)

SEBI’s 2025 amendments to the LODR Regulations introduce a new governance framework for High-Value Debt Listed Entities (HVDLEs) with ₹1,000 crore+ in listed NCDs. These norms align debt entities with equity governance standards, mandating board independence, committee oversight, and compliance timelines. This post unpacks key obligations, implications, and what debt-heavy issuers must do to remain compliant.

Cover image for the article: RBI Issues April 2025 Policy Statement; Proposes Co-Lending Framework for All Regulated Entities

17 Apr 2025

3

Min Read

RBI Issues April 2025 Policy Statement; Proposes Co-Lending Framework for All Regulated Entities

The RBI’s April 2025 Statement outlines key draft measures for co-lending expansion, stressed asset securitisation, harmonised gold loan norms, and UPI limit rationalisation. It further proposes a ‘theme-neutral’ fintech sandbox to foster continuous innovation. These reforms reflect the RBI’s proactive approach to market-based regulation, financial inclusion, and systemic resilience through stakeholder-driven policy development.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Cheque Bounce Complaint Quashed for Suppression of Material Facts

11 Apr 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court: Cheque Bounce Complaint Quashed for Suppression of Material Facts

The Supreme Court has quashed a cheque bounce complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, citing deliberate suppression of critical defence documents by the complainant. The judgment reinforces that criminal prosecution cannot proceed where procedural fairness is compromised. This decision underscores the duty of complainants to disclose all material facts when initiating criminal process.

Cover image for the article: Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

09 Apr 2025

2

Min Read

Government Revises MSME Classification Thresholds

The Central Government has revised the investment and turnover thresholds for classifying Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises under the MSME Act, effective from 1 April 2025. The updated limits aim to broaden MSME coverage and enhance access to statutory benefits for a wider base of enterprises, subject to timely Udyam re-registration.

Cover image for the article: Constitutional Limits on Pre-Trial Incarceration: Delhi High Court Harmonizes Article 21 and Section 45 of the PMLA in Grant of Bail

30 Mar 2025

5

Min Read

Constitutional Limits on Pre-Trial Incarceration: Delhi High Court Harmonizes Article 21 and Section 45 of the PMLA in Grant of Bail

The Delhi High Court, in Christian James Michel v. Directorate of Enforcement, granted bail under PMLA on grounds of prolonged undertrial incarceration. The judgment highlights the constitutional imperative under Article 21 and harmonises it with the stringent bail provisions of Section 45 PMLA, reinforcing the jurisprudence against indefinite pre-trial detention in economic offences.

Cover image for the article: Appellate Tribunal Clarifies Penalty Standards and Compliance Duties under the SEBI’s Investment Adviser Regulations

27 Mar 2025

4

Min Read

Appellate Tribunal Clarifies Penalty Standards and Compliance Duties under the SEBI’s Investment Adviser Regulations

The SAT’s ruling in CapitalVia Global Research Ltd. v. SEBI offers valuable guidance on regulatory compliance for investment advisers under the SEBI framework. While upholding nine out of thirteen charges—including KYC failures, risk profiling lapses, and misleading disclosures—the Tribunal reduced the penalty from ₹1 crore to ₹70 lakhs, reaffirming the importance of proportionality in enforcement and the fiduciary obligations of advisory firms.

Cover image for the article: No Benami Without Ownership: Tribunal Rejects Attachment Based on Mere Agreement to Sell

20 Mar 2025

3

Min Read

No Benami without Ownership: Tribunal Rejects Attachment Based on Mere Agreement to Sell

The Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA held that a mere agreement to sell, unsupported by a registered sale deed or actual possession, does not constitute a benami transaction under section 2(9)(A) of the Benami Act. In setting aside the provisional attachment, the Tribunal reaffirmed settled law that partial payments and unproven cash transfers do not suffice to trigger Benami Act consequences.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Executive Directors' Liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act

20 Mar 2025

4

Min Read

Supreme Court Clarifies Non-Executive Directors' Liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act

In K.S. Mehta v. Morgan Securities, the Supreme Court decisively addressed the vicarious liability of non-executive directors under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Reinforcing strict construction principles, the Court quashed criminal proceedings against directors lacking active involvement, setting a clear precedent on the necessity of specific allegations for liability under Section 141.

Cover image for the article: SEBI’s 2025 Insider Trading Amendment: Expanding the UPSI Framework

19 Mar 2025

4

Min Read

SEBI’s 2025 Insider Trading Amendment: Expanding the UPSI Framework

SEBI’s 2025 amendment to the Insider Trading Regulations expands the definition of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (UPSI), introduces new disclosure triggers, and streamlines compliance with structured data protocols. This regulatory update signals a decisive shift toward pre-emptive corporate transparency and robust market integrity safeguards.

Cover image for the article: IFSCA Mandates Cybersecurity & Resilience Norms for Regulated Entities in IFSC

17 Mar 2025

5

Min Read

IFSCA Mandates Cybersecurity & Resilience Norms for Regulated Entities in IFSC

The IFSCA has issued a comprehensive framework on cyber security and resilience for regulated entities operating in IFSC. These guidelines mandate robust governance, data protection, IT asset management, and incident reporting measures to counter escalating cyber threats. Regulated entities must adopt structured protocols, undergo annual audits, and manage third-party risk to ensure financial system stability.

Cover image for the article: Expanding Scope and Strengthening Enforcement: Significant Amendments in the CCI’s 2025 Recovery Regulations

04 Mar 2025

7

Min Read

Expanding Scope and Strengthening Enforcement: Significant Amendments in the CCI’s 2025 Recovery Regulations

CCI’s 2025 regulations overhaul penalty recovery with expanded scope, third-party liability, and legal heir accountability.

Cover image for the article: Sanction for Prosecution: Did the Supreme Court Overlook Deemed Sanction Under BNSS?

03 Mar 2025

5

Min Read

Sanction for Prosecution: Did the Supreme Court Overlook Deemed Sanction under BNSS?

Did the Supreme Court overlook BNSS’s deemed sanction provision? This analysis dissects the ruling's impact on public servant prosecutions.

Cover image for the article: A Comprehensive Overview of the EU’s AI Act: New Era in AI Governance – A Bold Step or a Regulatory Minefield?

28 Feb 2025

17

Min Read

A Comprehensive Overview of the EU’s AI Act: New Era in AI Governance – a Bold Step or a Regulatory Minefield?

An in-depth analysis of the EU's AI Act—its key provisions, risk-based approach, and global implications for AI governance.

Cover image for the article: Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Rajesh Agarwal Doctrine: Personal Hearing Must Precede Fraud Classification

28 Feb 2025

5

Min Read

Delhi High Court Reaffirms the Rajesh Agarwal Doctrine: Personal Hearing Must Precede Fraud Classification

In a pivotal ruling, the Delhi High Court has reaffirmed that borrowers are entitled to a personal hearing before their accounts are classified as fraud under the RBI Master Directions. Drawing upon the Supreme Court’s decision in SBI v. Rajesh Agarwal, the Court reinforced that procedural fairness and natural justice demand more than just written representation when civil consequences are involved.

Cover image for the article: RBI Introduces .bank.in and .fin.in to Strengthen Financial Security and Combat Fraud

13 Feb 2025

3

Min Read

RBI Introduces .Bank.in and .Fin.in to Strengthen Financial Security and Combat Fraud

RBI launches .bank.in for banks and plans .fin.in for NBFCs, enhancing cybersecurity and safeguarding users from financial fraud.

Cover image for the article: SEBI Strengthens Regulations for Persons Associated with the Securities Market

07 Feb 2025

4

Min Read

SEBI Strengthens Regulations for Persons Associated with the Securities Market

SEBI enforces stricter regulations on market associations, barring unauthorised investment advisory and misleading return claims.

Cover image for the article: RBI’s Revised Penalty & Compounding Framework Under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007: Strict Yet Balanced

04 Feb 2025

4

Min Read

RBI’s Revised Penalty & Compounding Framework under the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007: Strict yet Balanced

RBI introduces a revised framework for penalties & compounding under the PSS Act, ensuring fair enforcement & compliance clarity.

Cover image for the article: Appellate Tribunal Holds Unexecuted Agreement Not Benami under Section 2(9)(A) of the Benami Act

30 Jan 2025

4

Min Read

Appellate Tribunal Holds Unexecuted Agreement Not Benami under Section 2(9)(a) of the Benami Act

In a significant ruling under the Benami Act, the SAFEMA Appellate Tribunal quashed a provisional attachment order where no sale deed was executed and ownership never transferred. The case reinforces that partial payment and mere intent to purchase do not amount to a benami transaction under s. 2(9)(A), absent legal title or possession.

Cover image for the article: [Delhi HC] Delayed Adjudication under Customs Act Results in Violation of Principles of Natural Justice

19 Jan 2025

4

Min Read

[Delhi HC] Delayed Adjudication under Customs Act Results in Violation of Principles of Natural Justice

A pivotal Delhi HC ruling underscores that prolonged adjudication delays in customs cases breach the principles of natural justice.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court Clarifies Impact of Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony on Criminal Trials

17 Jan 2025

3

Min Read

Supreme Court Clarifies Impact of Minor Discrepancies in Witness Testimony on Criminal Trials

The SC clarifies that minor contradictions in witness testimony do not undermine the prosecution's case if overall evidence is reliable.

Cover image for the article: Supreme Court: Sanction Orders and Procedural Justice in Anti-Corruption Trials

15 Jan 2025

3

Min Read

Supreme Court: Sanction Orders and Procedural Justice in Anti-Corruption Trials

The Supreme Court clarifies the validity of sanction orders under the Prevention of Corruption Act and their impact on justice and fairness.

Cover image for the article: Enhancing Credit Transparency in India: RBI Issues Comprehensive Guidelines for Credit Information Reporting

09 Jan 2025

6

Min Read

Enhancing Credit Transparency in India: RBI Issues Comprehensive Guidelines for Credit Information Reporting

RBI guidelines streamline credit reporting, enhancing transparency, data accuracy, and grievance redressal for borrowers and institutions.

Cover image for the article: The Ethical Compass of Legal Advocacy

06 Jan 2025

7

Min Read

The Ethical Compass of Legal Advocacy

Explore the role of ethics in legal advocacy, addressing key challenges lawyers face and why integrity is vital for justice and success.

Cover image for the article: Breaking Down the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025: With Examples that Affect your Daily Life

06 Jan 2025

8

Min Read

Breaking down the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025: With Examples that Affect Your Daily Life

Explore the Digital Personal Data Protection Rules, 2025, with practical examples to understand their impact on businesses and daily life.